Difference between revisions of "Talk:North Zirakgunda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* I think we should go for a consistent naming scheme for maps here, personally I'd prefer simply the name of the internal map, i.e. Zirakgunda here, instead of "Map Internal Map" as this keeps the naming problems that we're trying to get rid of with these moves.--[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 22:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC) | * I think we should go for a consistent naming scheme for maps here, personally I'd prefer simply the name of the internal map, i.e. Zirakgunda here, instead of "Map Internal Map" as this keeps the naming problems that we're trying to get rid of with these moves.--[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 22:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What do you suggest for internal maps called "Diamond cave" or "north cave" we'll have problems with dose if we don't use the main map name also. --[[User:Zarkuu|Zarkuu]] 22:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:28, 4 November 2008
- I think we should go for a consistent naming scheme for maps here, personally I'd prefer simply the name of the internal map, i.e. Zirakgunda here, instead of "Map Internal Map" as this keeps the naming problems that we're trying to get rid of with these moves.--Ermabwed 22:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
What do you suggest for internal maps called "Diamond cave" or "north cave" we'll have problems with dose if we don't use the main map name also. --Zarkuu 22:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
