Difference between revisions of "Talk:The artificer cape"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I agree, I've seen you renaming a page to "Cape of passive camouflage" why not use "Cape of Passive Camouflage"? I'm using caps on every words except "of" and "the". --[[User:Zarkuu|Zarkuu]] 21:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC) | I agree, I've seen you renaming a page to "Cape of passive camouflage" why not use "Cape of Passive Camouflage"? I'm using caps on every words except "of" and "the". --[[User:Zarkuu|Zarkuu]] 21:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * I prefer to go with what the server calls the items, which isn't necessarily consistent. Where in doubt I'd like to go with proper English spelling; of course one can argue, that "Passive Camouflage" is the name of the cape and thus should be written like that, however, we can always add a page that corresponds to an alternative writing/spelling/capitalization of an item and which simply redirects to the "proper/server" spelling. --[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 09:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:59, 5 November 2008
- Eye says "The artificer cape", I think the page name "Artificer Cape" is better though (in view of page name = eye description).--Ermabwed 21:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree, I've seen you renaming a page to "Cape of passive camouflage" why not use "Cape of Passive Camouflage"? I'm using caps on every words except "of" and "the". --Zarkuu 21:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- I prefer to go with what the server calls the items, which isn't necessarily consistent. Where in doubt I'd like to go with proper English spelling; of course one can argue, that "Passive Camouflage" is the name of the cape and thus should be written like that, however, we can always add a page that corresponds to an alternative writing/spelling/capitalization of an item and which simply redirects to the "proper/server" spelling. --Ermabwed 09:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)