Difference between revisions of "Template talk:ManuInfo"

From ELWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Moved the discussion to this page, added one more point.)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* In some cases (thinking mostly summoning) it might be nice to check if the <nowiki>[[Image:item]]</nowiki> does exist and not show the image-link if it doesn't, however one could also argue that the link might create an incentive to add more images, which would be a good thing.
 
* In some cases (thinking mostly summoning) it might be nice to check if the <nowiki>[[Image:item]]</nowiki> does exist and not show the image-link if it doesn't, however one could also argue that the link might create an incentive to add more images, which would be a good thing.
 
--[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 21:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 21:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
* I we move manu thing to that kind of format we should better write script who does most of the work for us?! I'll see if I can make one.

Revision as of 14:08, 5 December 2008

  • Moved couple of points from User talk:Zarkuu.
  • Some things might be worth to discuss, including
    • should "no knowledge required" be printed or no line at all in that case?
    • should a line "no nexus required" be added in case that is so?
    • should the table of contents be forced to the right (see Help:Section) by including
{| align="right"
 | __TOC__
|}

I've been doing this on a couple of pages, looks nice, imo.

  • Using this template will also get us to realize some redirects (e.g. in the book and potion department as well as stuff like "Mortar Pestle").
    PS: This will adapt nicely if we ever want to give up on that subdirectory-pita.
  • In some cases (thinking mostly summoning) it might be nice to check if the [[Image:item]] does exist and not show the image-link if it doesn't, however one could also argue that the link might create an incentive to add more images, which would be a good thing.

--Ermabwed 21:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

  • I we move manu thing to that kind of format we should better write script who does most of the work for us?! I'll see if I can make one.