Difference between revisions of "Template talk:ManuInfo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 21:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 21:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
* I we move manu thing to that kind of format we should better write script who does most of the work for us?! I'll see if I can make one. | * I we move manu thing to that kind of format we should better write script who does most of the work for us?! I'll see if I can make one. | ||
| + | [[User:Demad|Demad]] 14:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 5 December 2008
- Moved couple of points from User talk:Zarkuu.
- Some things might be worth to discuss, including
- should "no knowledge required" be printed or no line at all in that case?
- should a line "no nexus required" be added in case that is so?
- should the table of contents be forced to the right (see Help:Section) by including
{| align="right"
| __TOC__
|}
I've been doing this on a couple of pages, looks nice, imo.
- Using this template will also get us to realize some redirects (e.g. in the book and potion department as well as stuff like "Mortar Pestle").
PS: This will adapt nicely if we ever want to give up on that subdirectory-pita. - In some cases (thinking mostly summoning) it might be nice to check if the [[Image:item]] does exist and not show the image-link if it doesn't, however one could also argue that the link might create an incentive to add more images, which would be a good thing.
--Ermabwed 21:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- I we move manu thing to that kind of format we should better write script who does most of the work for us?! I'll see if I can make one.
Demad 14:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
