Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armed Goblin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (added a hr and sig to make the discussion better readable) |
m |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* The Navs are too large, at some point we might want to split them up or remove them all together (this is especially true of Books/Nav, I remarked on that on the discussion page of that template earlier). | * The Navs are too large, at some point we might want to split them up or remove them all together (this is especially true of Books/Nav, I remarked on that on the discussion page of that template earlier). | ||
--[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 11:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 11:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Ok, how do you like it now? I think it looks nice now, the level 2 headings with the horizontal rule structure the information nicely. --[[User:Ermabwed|Ermabwed]] 11:21, 6 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:21, 6 December 2008
Just two things.
- I personally like the creature image on the right of the page (it fills up the page that way).
- I think that the summoning information should be on a different page or at least in the bottom of the page (if you go to the creature page from the Creatures Index or any other link the summoning info it's not what you are looking for so it shouldn't be in the beginning).
(Zarkuu)
- I think the contents somewhere on the left between pic and stats looks really bad, which is why I would prefer it on the right.
- The pic then gets in the way, the current setup is one i found to be consistent with other pages (items and such); text|ToC|pic looks much too cluttered at least on the computers I am using and the same goes for text|"pic over ToC" or the the other way around.
- Would a setup as it is now but with contents and pic exchanged work better for you? I.e. pic|ToC, then text below. I'd be fine with that.
- I agree on the summoning information, I just edited that where it was, best have it go below the drops.
- The Navs are too large, at some point we might want to split them up or remove them all together (this is especially true of Books/Nav, I remarked on that on the discussion page of that template earlier).
--Ermabwed 11:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, how do you like it now? I think it looks nice now, the level 2 headings with the horizontal rule structure the information nicely. --Ermabwed 11:21, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
